Abstract
This article explores the embodied nature of training in social anthropology and reveals how, while working in multidisciplinary teams and drawing on research methods and approaches more commonly associated with other disciplines, one might still be 'outed' in one's interpretation and analysis. I draw on the experience of working on a project exploring methodological issues and challenges to conducting research with terminally ill cancer patients to reveal the importance of situating ourselves as researchers firmly within the prejudices of our own societies. While personal experience of losing a parent to cancer should have alerted me to other ways of seeing cancer, I was nevertheless obliged to confront sociocultural constructions of cancer and recognise them as my own. Through understanding the power of 'imagined experience', I gained further insight into how intersubjectivity and reflexivity are crucial to the research process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-13 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Anthropology in Action |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- multidisciplinary research
- cancer experiences
- intersubjectivity
- reflexivity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer the bogeyman and me: reflexivity and emotion in 'end of life' research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver