Brexit and the future of UK fisheries governance: learning lessons from Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Brexit presents significant challenges and uncertainties for the future governance of policy areas currently managed by the EU. This is especially the case with fisheries policy. The UK government has stated an ambition for post-Brexit fisheries policy to be based on sustainability and the use of scientific evidence. Yet how these aims will be achieved and formalised into post-Brexit governance structures remains to be seen. This article investigates fisheries governance arrangements in three non-EU countries: Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands. These cases offer lessons for the UK on governance and institutional arrangements for fisheries post-Brexit. However, none of these cases account for devolution and division of fisheries policy competences across multiple territories. This places significant limits on the potential for direct policy transfer from these countries to the UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-340
Number of pages14
JournalContemporary Social Science
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date3 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Iceland
fishery
Norway
governance
learning
policy area
decentralization
EU
sustainability
Governance
Fisheries
uncertainty
evidence
Arrangement

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • Fisheries policy
  • Faroe Islands
  • Norway
  • Iceland
  • Policy transfer

Cite this

@article{4d510cf9f5164d7e861709e97409b175,
title = "Brexit and the future of UK fisheries governance: learning lessons from Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands",
abstract = "Brexit presents significant challenges and uncertainties for the future governance of policy areas currently managed by the EU. This is especially the case with fisheries policy. The UK government has stated an ambition for post-Brexit fisheries policy to be based on sustainability and the use of scientific evidence. Yet how these aims will be achieved and formalised into post-Brexit governance structures remains to be seen. This article investigates fisheries governance arrangements in three non-EU countries: Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands. These cases offer lessons for the UK on governance and institutional arrangements for fisheries post-Brexit. However, none of these cases account for devolution and division of fisheries policy competences across multiple territories. This places significant limits on the potential for direct policy transfer from these countries to the UK.",
keywords = "Brexit, Fisheries policy, Faroe Islands, Norway, Iceland, Policy transfer",
author = "Christopher Huggins and John Connolly and Craig McAngus and {Van Der Zwet}, Arno",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/21582041.2018.1516296",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "327--340",
journal = "Contemporary Social Science",
issn = "2158-2041",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brexit and the future of UK fisheries governance: learning lessons from Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands

AU - Huggins, Christopher

AU - Connolly, John

AU - McAngus, Craig

AU - Van Der Zwet, Arno

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - Brexit presents significant challenges and uncertainties for the future governance of policy areas currently managed by the EU. This is especially the case with fisheries policy. The UK government has stated an ambition for post-Brexit fisheries policy to be based on sustainability and the use of scientific evidence. Yet how these aims will be achieved and formalised into post-Brexit governance structures remains to be seen. This article investigates fisheries governance arrangements in three non-EU countries: Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands. These cases offer lessons for the UK on governance and institutional arrangements for fisheries post-Brexit. However, none of these cases account for devolution and division of fisheries policy competences across multiple territories. This places significant limits on the potential for direct policy transfer from these countries to the UK.

AB - Brexit presents significant challenges and uncertainties for the future governance of policy areas currently managed by the EU. This is especially the case with fisheries policy. The UK government has stated an ambition for post-Brexit fisheries policy to be based on sustainability and the use of scientific evidence. Yet how these aims will be achieved and formalised into post-Brexit governance structures remains to be seen. This article investigates fisheries governance arrangements in three non-EU countries: Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands. These cases offer lessons for the UK on governance and institutional arrangements for fisheries post-Brexit. However, none of these cases account for devolution and division of fisheries policy competences across multiple territories. This places significant limits on the potential for direct policy transfer from these countries to the UK.

KW - Brexit

KW - Fisheries policy

KW - Faroe Islands

KW - Norway

KW - Iceland

KW - Policy transfer

U2 - 10.1080/21582041.2018.1516296

DO - 10.1080/21582041.2018.1516296

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 327

EP - 340

JO - Contemporary Social Science

JF - Contemporary Social Science

SN - 2158-2041

IS - 2

ER -