Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine whether ambivalent sexism predicts subtle rape myth acceptance. Respondents comprised of 211 university students, who completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011). Results indicated that while benevolent sexism significantly predicted acceptance of subtle rape myths, hostile sexism did not. Additionally, male participants reported more ambivalent sexism and subtle rape myth acceptance than females. These findings add to the literature investigating gender inequality and rape mythology by giving a first account on the link between subtle rape myths and ambivalent sexist attitudes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 284-295 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Feb 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality -
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- gender-based violence
- rape mythology
- subtle rape myths
- ambivalent sexism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Blame is in the eye of the beholder: assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver