Blame is in the eye of the beholder: assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance

Valentina Gosetti; Kallia Manoussaki

doi:10.14738/assrj.82.9669

Blame is in the eye of the beholder: assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance

Valentina Gosetti, Kallia Manoussaki

School of Education and Social Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

306 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether ambivalent sexism predicts subtle rape myth acceptance. Respondents comprised of 211 university students, who completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011). Results indicated that while benevolent sexism significantly predicted acceptance of subtle rape myths, hostile sexism did not. Additionally, male participants reported more ambivalent sexism and subtle rape myth acceptance than females. These findings add to the literature investigating gender inequality and rape mythology by giving a first account on the link between subtle rape myths and ambivalent sexist attitudes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	284-295
Number of pages	12
Journal	Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.82.9669
Publication status	Published - 23 Feb 2021

Keywords

gender-based violence
rape mythology
subtle rape myths
ambivalent sexism

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.14738/assrj.82.9669Licence: CC BY

2021 02 01 Gosetti et al Blame finalFinal published version, 224 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{e4f98e4cc0584e3891fb71ba06cb2e02,

title = "Blame is in the eye of the beholder: assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance",

abstract = "The aim of the present study was to determine whether ambivalent sexism predicts subtle rape myth acceptance. Respondents comprised of 211 university students, who completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011). Results indicated that while benevolent sexism significantly predicted acceptance of subtle rape myths, hostile sexism did not. Additionally, male participants reported more ambivalent sexism and subtle rape myth acceptance than females. These findings add to the literature investigating gender inequality and rape mythology by giving a first account on the link between subtle rape myths and ambivalent sexist attitudes.",

keywords = "gender-based violence, rape mythology, subtle rape myths, ambivalent sexism",

author = "Valentina Gosetti and Kallia Manoussaki",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "23",

doi = "10.14738/assrj.82.9669",

language = "English",

volume = " 8",

pages = "284--295",

journal = "Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal",

publisher = "Services for Science and Education Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blame is in the eye of the beholder

T2 - assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance

AU - Gosetti, Valentina

AU - Manoussaki, Kallia

PY - 2021/2/23

Y1 - 2021/2/23

N2 - The aim of the present study was to determine whether ambivalent sexism predicts subtle rape myth acceptance. Respondents comprised of 211 university students, who completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011). Results indicated that while benevolent sexism significantly predicted acceptance of subtle rape myths, hostile sexism did not. Additionally, male participants reported more ambivalent sexism and subtle rape myth acceptance than females. These findings add to the literature investigating gender inequality and rape mythology by giving a first account on the link between subtle rape myths and ambivalent sexist attitudes.

AB - The aim of the present study was to determine whether ambivalent sexism predicts subtle rape myth acceptance. Respondents comprised of 211 university students, who completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011). Results indicated that while benevolent sexism significantly predicted acceptance of subtle rape myths, hostile sexism did not. Additionally, male participants reported more ambivalent sexism and subtle rape myth acceptance than females. These findings add to the literature investigating gender inequality and rape mythology by giving a first account on the link between subtle rape myths and ambivalent sexist attitudes.

KW - gender-based violence

KW - rape mythology

KW - subtle rape myths

KW - ambivalent sexism

U2 - 10.14738/assrj.82.9669

DO - 10.14738/assrj.82.9669

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 284

EP - 295

JO - Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

JF - Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

IS - 2

ER -

Blame is in the eye of the beholder: assessing the role of ambivalent sexism on subtle rape myth acceptance

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this