Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel? A socio-spatial analysis

Julie Clark, Angela Curl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Public bicycle and car sharing schemes have proliferated in recent years and are increasingly part of the urban transport landscape. Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility: these initiatives could remove some of the barriers to car ownership or bicycle usage such as upfront costs, maintenance and storage. However, the existing evidence base indicates that, in reality, users are most likely to be white, male and middle class. This paper argues that there is a need to consider the social inclusivity of sharing schemes and to develop appropriate evaluation frameworks accordingly. We therefore open by considering ways in which shared transport schemes might be inclusive or not, using a framework developed from accessibility planning. In the second part of the paper, we use the case study of Glasgow in Scotland to undertake a spatial equity analysis of such schemes. We examine how well they serve different population groups across the city, using the locations of bicycle stations and car club parking spaces in Glasgow, comparing and contrasting bike and car. An apparent failure to deliver benefits across the demographic spectrum raises important questions about the socially inclusive nature of public investment in similar schemes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-99
JournalSocial Inclusion
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spatial Analysis
Ownership
bicycle
Scotland
Population Groups
travel
Maintenance
Demography
Costs and Cost Analysis
car sharing
public investment
population group
club
middle class
equity
inclusion
planning
costs
evaluation
evidence

Keywords

  • social inclusion
  • Transport policy
  • Car share
  • Bicycling
  • spatial analysis
  • shared transport
  • modal shift
  • Glasgow Scotland

Cite this

@article{d6b2ca59f8fe41658ad6ddf4bab16d49,
title = "Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel?: A socio-spatial analysis",
abstract = "Public bicycle and car sharing schemes have proliferated in recent years and are increasingly part of the urban transport landscape. Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility: these initiatives could remove some of the barriers to car ownership or bicycle usage such as upfront costs, maintenance and storage. However, the existing evidence base indicates that, in reality, users are most likely to be white, male and middle class. This paper argues that there is a need to consider the social inclusivity of sharing schemes and to develop appropriate evaluation frameworks accordingly. We therefore open by considering ways in which shared transport schemes might be inclusive or not, using a framework developed from accessibility planning. In the second part of the paper, we use the case study of Glasgow in Scotland to undertake a spatial equity analysis of such schemes. We examine how well they serve different population groups across the city, using the locations of bicycle stations and car club parking spaces in Glasgow, comparing and contrasting bike and car. An apparent failure to deliver benefits across the demographic spectrum raises important questions about the socially inclusive nature of public investment in similar schemes.",
keywords = "social inclusion, Transport policy, Car share, Bicycling, spatial analysis, shared transport, modal shift, Glasgow Scotland",
author = "Julie Clark and Angela Curl",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.17645/si.v4i3.510",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "83--99",
journal = "Social Inclusion",
issn = "2183-2803",
publisher = "Cogitatio Press",
number = "3",

}

Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel? A socio-spatial analysis. / Clark, Julie; Curl, Angela.

In: Social Inclusion, Vol. 4, No. 3, 07.06.2016, p. 83-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel?

T2 - A socio-spatial analysis

AU - Clark, Julie

AU - Curl, Angela

PY - 2016/6/7

Y1 - 2016/6/7

N2 - Public bicycle and car sharing schemes have proliferated in recent years and are increasingly part of the urban transport landscape. Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility: these initiatives could remove some of the barriers to car ownership or bicycle usage such as upfront costs, maintenance and storage. However, the existing evidence base indicates that, in reality, users are most likely to be white, male and middle class. This paper argues that there is a need to consider the social inclusivity of sharing schemes and to develop appropriate evaluation frameworks accordingly. We therefore open by considering ways in which shared transport schemes might be inclusive or not, using a framework developed from accessibility planning. In the second part of the paper, we use the case study of Glasgow in Scotland to undertake a spatial equity analysis of such schemes. We examine how well they serve different population groups across the city, using the locations of bicycle stations and car club parking spaces in Glasgow, comparing and contrasting bike and car. An apparent failure to deliver benefits across the demographic spectrum raises important questions about the socially inclusive nature of public investment in similar schemes.

AB - Public bicycle and car sharing schemes have proliferated in recent years and are increasingly part of the urban transport landscape. Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility: these initiatives could remove some of the barriers to car ownership or bicycle usage such as upfront costs, maintenance and storage. However, the existing evidence base indicates that, in reality, users are most likely to be white, male and middle class. This paper argues that there is a need to consider the social inclusivity of sharing schemes and to develop appropriate evaluation frameworks accordingly. We therefore open by considering ways in which shared transport schemes might be inclusive or not, using a framework developed from accessibility planning. In the second part of the paper, we use the case study of Glasgow in Scotland to undertake a spatial equity analysis of such schemes. We examine how well they serve different population groups across the city, using the locations of bicycle stations and car club parking spaces in Glasgow, comparing and contrasting bike and car. An apparent failure to deliver benefits across the demographic spectrum raises important questions about the socially inclusive nature of public investment in similar schemes.

KW - social inclusion

KW - Transport policy

KW - Car share

KW - Bicycling

KW - spatial analysis

KW - shared transport

KW - modal shift

KW - Glasgow Scotland

U2 - 10.17645/si.v4i3.510

DO - 10.17645/si.v4i3.510

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 83

EP - 99

JO - Social Inclusion

JF - Social Inclusion

SN - 2183-2803

IS - 3

ER -