Assessment of alternative manual control methods for small unmanned aerial vehicles

Jonathan Stevenson, Siu O'Young, Luc Rolland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper is a summary of experiments to access alternative methods to control a small (<25 kg)1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in manual mode. While it is true that the majority of the UAV airborne activities will be in autonomous mode (i.e. using an autopilot) this may not always be the case during takeoffs and landings, or if there is a failure of the autopilot. The requirement for a manual control mode for all flight stages remains in proposed UAV regulations currently being defined both in Canada and the U.S. The question then becomes “If we have to take manual control of the UAV, what is the best method?” The research summarized in this paper is an attempt this question.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)952-959
JournalProcedia Manufacturing
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Manual control
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)
Takeoff
Landing
Experiments

Cite this

@article{ce74b4004c784c689d72d14b39e237bc,
title = "Assessment of alternative manual control methods for small unmanned aerial vehicles",
abstract = "This paper is a summary of experiments to access alternative methods to control a small (<25 kg)1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in manual mode. While it is true that the majority of the UAV airborne activities will be in autonomous mode (i.e. using an autopilot) this may not always be the case during takeoffs and landings, or if there is a failure of the autopilot. The requirement for a manual control mode for all flight stages remains in proposed UAV regulations currently being defined both in Canada and the U.S. The question then becomes “If we have to take manual control of the UAV, what is the best method?” The research summarized in this paper is an attempt this question.",
author = "Jonathan Stevenson and Siu O'Young and Luc Rolland",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.144",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "952--959",
journal = "Procedia Manufacturing",
issn = "2351-9789",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

Assessment of alternative manual control methods for small unmanned aerial vehicles. / Stevenson, Jonathan; O'Young, Siu; Rolland, Luc.

In: Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, 2015, p. 952-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of alternative manual control methods for small unmanned aerial vehicles

AU - Stevenson, Jonathan

AU - O'Young, Siu

AU - Rolland, Luc

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper is a summary of experiments to access alternative methods to control a small (<25 kg)1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in manual mode. While it is true that the majority of the UAV airborne activities will be in autonomous mode (i.e. using an autopilot) this may not always be the case during takeoffs and landings, or if there is a failure of the autopilot. The requirement for a manual control mode for all flight stages remains in proposed UAV regulations currently being defined both in Canada and the U.S. The question then becomes “If we have to take manual control of the UAV, what is the best method?” The research summarized in this paper is an attempt this question.

AB - This paper is a summary of experiments to access alternative methods to control a small (<25 kg)1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in manual mode. While it is true that the majority of the UAV airborne activities will be in autonomous mode (i.e. using an autopilot) this may not always be the case during takeoffs and landings, or if there is a failure of the autopilot. The requirement for a manual control mode for all flight stages remains in proposed UAV regulations currently being defined both in Canada and the U.S. The question then becomes “If we have to take manual control of the UAV, what is the best method?” The research summarized in this paper is an attempt this question.

U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.144

DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.144

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 952

EP - 959

JO - Procedia Manufacturing

JF - Procedia Manufacturing

SN - 2351-9789

ER -