Assessing composition in modeling approaches

Gunter Mussbacher; Omar Alam; Mohammad Alhaj; Shaukat Ali; Nuno Amálio; Balbir Barn; Rolv  Bræk; Tony Clark; Benoit Combemale; Luiz Marcio Cysneiros; Urooj Fatima; Robert France; Geri Georg; Jennifer Horkoff; Jörg Kienzle; Julio Cesar Leite; Timothy C. Lethbridge; Markus Luckey; Ana Moreira; Felix Mutz; A. Padua A. Oliveira; Dorina C. Petriu; Matthias Schöttle; Lucy Troup; Vera M.B. Werneck

doi:10.1145/2459031.2459032

Assessing composition in modeling approaches

Gunter Mussbacher, Omar Alam, Mohammad Alhaj, Shaukat Ali, Nuno Amálio, Balbir Barn, Rolv Bræk, Tony Clark, Benoit Combemale, Luiz Marcio Cysneiros, Urooj Fatima, Robert France, Geri Georg, Jennifer Horkoff, Jörg Kienzle, Julio Cesar Leite, Timothy C. Lethbridge, Markus Luckey, Ana Moreira, Felix MutzA. Padua A. Oliveira, Dorina C. Petriu, Matthias Schöttle, Lucy Troup, Vera M.B. Werneck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low-level design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	CMA '12
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of the CMA 2012 Workshop
Place of Publication	New York
Publisher	ACM Press
Number of pages	26
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4503-1843-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2459031.2459032
Publication status	Published - 30 Sept 2012
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

composition
modeling
comparison criteria
case study

Access to Document

10.1145/2459031.2459032

Cite this

Mussbacher, G., Alam, O., Alhaj, M., Ali, S., Amálio, N., Barn, B., Bræk, R., Clark, T., Combemale, B., Cysneiros, L. M., Fatima, U., France, R., Georg, G., Horkoff, J., Kienzle, J., Leite, J. C., Lethbridge, T. C., Luckey, M., Moreira, A., ... Werneck, V. M. B. (2012). Assessing composition in modeling approaches. In CMA '12: Proceedings of the CMA 2012 Workshop Article 1 ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2459031.2459032

@inproceedings{accefeb2a28742ce818ad366578c8d63,

title = "Assessing composition in modeling approaches",

abstract = "Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low-level design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study.",

keywords = "composition, modeling, comparison criteria, case study",

author = "Gunter Mussbacher and Omar Alam and Mohammad Alhaj and Shaukat Ali and Nuno Am{\'a}lio and Balbir Barn and Rolv Br{\ae}k and Tony Clark and Benoit Combemale and Cysneiros, {Luiz Marcio} and Urooj Fatima and Robert France and Geri Georg and Jennifer Horkoff and J{\"o}rg Kienzle and Leite, {Julio Cesar} and Lethbridge, {Timothy C.} and Markus Luckey and Ana Moreira and Felix Mutz and Oliveira, {A. Padua A.} and Petriu, {Dorina C.} and Matthias Sch{\"o}ttle and Lucy Troup and Werneck, {Vera M.B.}",

year = "2012",

month = sep,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1145/2459031.2459032",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4503-1843-3",

booktitle = "CMA '12",

publisher = "ACM Press",

address = "United States",

}

Mussbacher, G, Alam, O, Alhaj, M, Ali, S, Amálio, N, Barn, B, Bræk, R, Clark, T, Combemale, B, Cysneiros, LM, Fatima, U, France, R, Georg, G, Horkoff, J, Kienzle, J, Leite, JC, Lethbridge, TC, Luckey, M, Moreira, A, Mutz, F, Oliveira, APA, Petriu, DC, Schöttle, M, Troup, L & Werneck, VMB 2012, Assessing composition in modeling approaches. in CMA '12: Proceedings of the CMA 2012 Workshop., 1, ACM Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2459031.2459032

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessing composition in modeling approaches

AU - Mussbacher, Gunter

AU - Alam, Omar

AU - Alhaj, Mohammad

AU - Ali, Shaukat

AU - Amálio, Nuno

AU - Barn, Balbir

AU - Bræk, Rolv

AU - Clark, Tony

AU - Combemale, Benoit

AU - Cysneiros, Luiz Marcio

AU - Fatima, Urooj

AU - France, Robert

AU - Georg, Geri

AU - Horkoff, Jennifer

AU - Kienzle, Jörg

AU - Leite, Julio Cesar

AU - Lethbridge, Timothy C.

AU - Luckey, Markus

AU - Moreira, Ana

AU - Mutz, Felix

AU - Oliveira, A. Padua A.

AU - Petriu, Dorina C.

AU - Schöttle, Matthias

AU - Troup, Lucy

AU - Werneck, Vera M.B.

PY - 2012/9/30

Y1 - 2012/9/30

N2 - Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low-level design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study.

AB - Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low-level design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study.

KW - composition

KW - modeling

KW - comparison criteria

KW - case study

U2 - 10.1145/2459031.2459032

DO - 10.1145/2459031.2459032

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-4503-1843-3

BT - CMA '12

PB - ACM Press

CY - New York

ER -

Assessing composition in modeling approaches

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this