Abstract
Continuing interest in digital games indicated that it would be useful to update Connolly et al.'s (2012) systematic literature review of empirical evidence about the positive impacts and outcomes of games. Since a large number of papers was identified in the period from 2009 to 2014, the current review focused on 143 papers that provided higher quality evidence about the positive outcomes of games. Connolly et al.'s multidimensional analysis of games and their outcomes provided a useful framework for organising the varied research in this area. The most frequently occurring outcome reported for games for learning was knowledge acquisition, while entertainment games addressed a broader range of affective, behaviour change, perceptual and cognitive and physiological outcomes. Games for learning were found across varied topics with STEM subjects and health the most popular. Future research on digital games would benefit from a systematic programme of experimental work, examining in detail which game features are most effective in promoting engagement and supporting learning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-192 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Computers & Education |
Volume | 94 |
Early online date | 10 Nov 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- Computer games
- Serious games
- Entertainment
- Engagement
- Learning
- Systematic literature review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Thomas Hainey
- School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences - Senior Lecturer
Person: Academic