An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior

Joan Ballantine, Xin Guo, Patricia Larres

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to investigate if individual and collaborative forms of academic dishonesty among UK undergraduate business related students could be predicted by students’ approaches to learning, age and gender. The study addresses Marsden et al.’s (2005) concern about the poor internal reliability of the instrument they used to measure academic orientation and adopts Tait et al’s (1998) short form Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) as the appropriate construct to measure students’ learning approaches. Additionally, it focuses on an under-researched classification of cheating behavior which reflects our modern collaborative society, namely a collectivist–individualist dichotomy. Data were collected for 1,033 UK business undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the fit of the data. Findings suggest that students’ approaches to learning are a determinant of academic misconduct, both of an individual and collaborative nature.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2014
EventEuropean Conference on Educational Research 2014: The Past, Present and Future of Educational Research in Europe - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Duration: 2 Sep 20145 Sep 2014
http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer2014/ (Conference website)
http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer2014/

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Conference on Educational Research 2014
Abbreviated titleECER 2014
CountryPortugal
CityPorto
Period2/09/145/09/14
OtherIn 2014 EERA is celebrating its 20th anniversary. This event offers an excellent opportunity to look back on the development and impact of educational research in Europe – as well as looking forward to its future. The EERA/ECER conference in Porto 2014 provides a time and space for the educational research community to be self-reflexive – to evaluate its strengths, weaknesses and possibilities. Educational research currently faces a number of challenges. It covers an extremely wide and varied range of activity, incorporating most disciplines within the academic world. The recent calls for interdisciplinarity create issues of academic identity. Moreover, the economic crisis in Europe is squeezing research budgets – and this at a time when policy-makers increasingly see education as the solution to a whole range of economic and social problems. Educational researchers need to consider how they can provide sound evidence with which to address these ambitious agendas.

Lessons from the past might be crucial to imagine different educational models and alternatives which demand a complex understanding of changes and the definition of values towards which education research would be committed. To interrogate what society expects from future generations is a key point to discuss different strategies, understanding expectations, aspirations and curiosity. To comprehend the core of education research in the past and in the present might turn into a reconceptualization of the school in itself. Given this, a number of questions are pivotal: What have been the major successes and failures of education research communities over the last decades? What can we learn from our past to help build our future in these turbulent times? Do the ways in which educational research has been used in practice and policy within Europe provide a good foundation for the future? Or do we need to develop different strategies? Can research be seen as a means to purpose radical alternatives? Can education research purpose robust suggestions and solutions? How can we ensure that, within the climate of increasing Europeanization, respect for national and local research priorities and practices is balanced with the need to find shared research aims, themes and methods? And finally, would it matter if educational research as a distinctive field disappeared?
Internet address

Fingerprint

learning
student
factor analysis
determinants
gender
Society

Cite this

Ballantine, J., Guo, X., & Larres, P. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior. Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research 2014, Porto, Portugal.
Ballantine, Joan ; Guo, Xin ; Larres, Patricia. / An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior. Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research 2014, Porto, Portugal.
@conference{cba2b8b100a84e77af70d07a4242d55f,
title = "An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior",
abstract = "The objective of the current study was to investigate if individual and collaborative forms of academic dishonesty among UK undergraduate business related students could be predicted by students’ approaches to learning, age and gender. The study addresses Marsden et al.’s (2005) concern about the poor internal reliability of the instrument they used to measure academic orientation and adopts Tait et al’s (1998) short form Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) as the appropriate construct to measure students’ learning approaches. Additionally, it focuses on an under-researched classification of cheating behavior which reflects our modern collaborative society, namely a collectivist–individualist dichotomy. Data were collected for 1,033 UK business undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the fit of the data. Findings suggest that students’ approaches to learning are a determinant of academic misconduct, both of an individual and collaborative nature.",
author = "Joan Ballantine and Xin Guo and Patricia Larres",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "5",
language = "English",
note = "European Conference on Educational Research 2014 : The Past, Present and Future of Educational Research in Europe, ECER 2014 ; Conference date: 02-09-2014 Through 05-09-2014",
url = "http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer2014/, http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer2014/",

}

Ballantine, J, Guo, X & Larres, P 2014, 'An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior' Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research 2014, Porto, Portugal, 2/09/14 - 5/09/14, .

An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior. / Ballantine, Joan; Guo, Xin; Larres, Patricia.

2014. Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research 2014, Porto, Portugal.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior

AU - Ballantine, Joan

AU - Guo, Xin

AU - Larres, Patricia

PY - 2014/9/5

Y1 - 2014/9/5

N2 - The objective of the current study was to investigate if individual and collaborative forms of academic dishonesty among UK undergraduate business related students could be predicted by students’ approaches to learning, age and gender. The study addresses Marsden et al.’s (2005) concern about the poor internal reliability of the instrument they used to measure academic orientation and adopts Tait et al’s (1998) short form Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) as the appropriate construct to measure students’ learning approaches. Additionally, it focuses on an under-researched classification of cheating behavior which reflects our modern collaborative society, namely a collectivist–individualist dichotomy. Data were collected for 1,033 UK business undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the fit of the data. Findings suggest that students’ approaches to learning are a determinant of academic misconduct, both of an individual and collaborative nature.

AB - The objective of the current study was to investigate if individual and collaborative forms of academic dishonesty among UK undergraduate business related students could be predicted by students’ approaches to learning, age and gender. The study addresses Marsden et al.’s (2005) concern about the poor internal reliability of the instrument they used to measure academic orientation and adopts Tait et al’s (1998) short form Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) as the appropriate construct to measure students’ learning approaches. Additionally, it focuses on an under-researched classification of cheating behavior which reflects our modern collaborative society, namely a collectivist–individualist dichotomy. Data were collected for 1,033 UK business undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the fit of the data. Findings suggest that students’ approaches to learning are a determinant of academic misconduct, both of an individual and collaborative nature.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Ballantine J, Guo X, Larres P. An investigation of the relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and Individual and Collaborative Academic Dishonest Behavior. 2014. Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research 2014, Porto, Portugal.