An Example of Large-group Drama and Cross-year Peer Assessment for Teaching Science in Higher Education

Katherine Sloman, Richard Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Undergraduate students pursuing a three‐year marine biology degree programme (n = 86) experienced a large‐group drama aimed at allowing them to explore how scientific research is funded and the associated links between science and society. In the drama, Year 1 students played the “general public” who decided which environmental research areas should be prioritised for funding, Year 2 students were the “scientists” who had to prepare research proposals which they hoped to get funded, and Year 3 students were the “research panel” who decided which proposals to fund with input from the priorities set by the “general public”. The drama, therefore, included an element of cross‐year peer assessment where Year 3 students evaluated the research proposals prepared by the Year 2 students. Questionnaires were distributed at the end of the activity to gather: (1) student perceptions on the cross‐year nature of the exercise, (2) the use of peer assessment, and (3) their overall views on the drama. The students valued the opportunity to interact with their peers from other years of the degree programme and most were comfortable with the use of cross‐year peer assessment. The majority of students felt that they had increased their knowledge of how research proposals are funded and the perceived benefits of the large‐group drama included increased critical thinking ability, confidence in presenting work to others, and enhanced communication skills. Only one student did not strongly advocate the use of this large‐group drama in subsequent years.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1877-1893
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume32
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Drama
  • Environmental education
  • Learning environment
  • Peer assessment
  • Science education
  • University

Cite this

@article{c6c0416ac5a84a5f80dca9d2b9a482c0,
title = "An Example of Large-group Drama and Cross-year Peer Assessment for Teaching Science in Higher Education",
abstract = "Undergraduate students pursuing a three‐year marine biology degree programme (n = 86) experienced a large‐group drama aimed at allowing them to explore how scientific research is funded and the associated links between science and society. In the drama, Year 1 students played the “general public” who decided which environmental research areas should be prioritised for funding, Year 2 students were the “scientists” who had to prepare research proposals which they hoped to get funded, and Year 3 students were the “research panel” who decided which proposals to fund with input from the priorities set by the “general public”. The drama, therefore, included an element of cross‐year peer assessment where Year 3 students evaluated the research proposals prepared by the Year 2 students. Questionnaires were distributed at the end of the activity to gather: (1) student perceptions on the cross‐year nature of the exercise, (2) the use of peer assessment, and (3) their overall views on the drama. The students valued the opportunity to interact with their peers from other years of the degree programme and most were comfortable with the use of cross‐year peer assessment. The majority of students felt that they had increased their knowledge of how research proposals are funded and the perceived benefits of the large‐group drama included increased critical thinking ability, confidence in presenting work to others, and enhanced communication skills. Only one student did not strongly advocate the use of this large‐group drama in subsequent years.",
keywords = "Assessment, Drama, Environmental education, Learning environment, Peer assessment, Science education, University",
author = "Katherine Sloman and Richard Thompson",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/09500690903229312",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1877--1893",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "14",

}

An Example of Large-group Drama and Cross-year Peer Assessment for Teaching Science in Higher Education. / Sloman, Katherine; Thompson, Richard.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 32, No. 14, 2010, p. 1877-1893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Example of Large-group Drama and Cross-year Peer Assessment for Teaching Science in Higher Education

AU - Sloman, Katherine

AU - Thompson, Richard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Undergraduate students pursuing a three‐year marine biology degree programme (n = 86) experienced a large‐group drama aimed at allowing them to explore how scientific research is funded and the associated links between science and society. In the drama, Year 1 students played the “general public” who decided which environmental research areas should be prioritised for funding, Year 2 students were the “scientists” who had to prepare research proposals which they hoped to get funded, and Year 3 students were the “research panel” who decided which proposals to fund with input from the priorities set by the “general public”. The drama, therefore, included an element of cross‐year peer assessment where Year 3 students evaluated the research proposals prepared by the Year 2 students. Questionnaires were distributed at the end of the activity to gather: (1) student perceptions on the cross‐year nature of the exercise, (2) the use of peer assessment, and (3) their overall views on the drama. The students valued the opportunity to interact with their peers from other years of the degree programme and most were comfortable with the use of cross‐year peer assessment. The majority of students felt that they had increased their knowledge of how research proposals are funded and the perceived benefits of the large‐group drama included increased critical thinking ability, confidence in presenting work to others, and enhanced communication skills. Only one student did not strongly advocate the use of this large‐group drama in subsequent years.

AB - Undergraduate students pursuing a three‐year marine biology degree programme (n = 86) experienced a large‐group drama aimed at allowing them to explore how scientific research is funded and the associated links between science and society. In the drama, Year 1 students played the “general public” who decided which environmental research areas should be prioritised for funding, Year 2 students were the “scientists” who had to prepare research proposals which they hoped to get funded, and Year 3 students were the “research panel” who decided which proposals to fund with input from the priorities set by the “general public”. The drama, therefore, included an element of cross‐year peer assessment where Year 3 students evaluated the research proposals prepared by the Year 2 students. Questionnaires were distributed at the end of the activity to gather: (1) student perceptions on the cross‐year nature of the exercise, (2) the use of peer assessment, and (3) their overall views on the drama. The students valued the opportunity to interact with their peers from other years of the degree programme and most were comfortable with the use of cross‐year peer assessment. The majority of students felt that they had increased their knowledge of how research proposals are funded and the perceived benefits of the large‐group drama included increased critical thinking ability, confidence in presenting work to others, and enhanced communication skills. Only one student did not strongly advocate the use of this large‐group drama in subsequent years.

KW - Assessment

KW - Drama

KW - Environmental education

KW - Learning environment

KW - Peer assessment

KW - Science education

KW - University

U2 - 10.1080/09500690903229312

DO - 10.1080/09500690903229312

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1877

EP - 1893

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 14

ER -