An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONTwo dimensional (2D) low cost, augmented video-based portable systems (AVPS) are commonly used for coaching in various sporting events to enhance performance as well as scientific or medical studies. Earlier works by Ugbolue et al,2013 have evaluated and validated the AVPS against the gold standard 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System using the 2D ProTrainer System software. This pilot study will compare the outputs of three popular AVPS software, SiliconCoachPro, SiliconCoach Live and Kinovea.
To date, there have been no studies performed to evaluate and compare the lower limb parameters during a golf swing using these three AVPS software.
METHODSTwelve healthy subjects participated in this study (Male: 6,Female: 6, Age: 22.5 ± 3.2 years, Weight: 76.7 ± 16.9kg).Participants were required to perform three golf swings whilst being recorded on the sagittal plane by a single, high speed video camera (240Hz). Wright (2008) describes past studies,which have used single cameras running at 200 frames per second, while monitoring golf motion captured in the sagittal plane. In this plane much movement of the club and arm swing technique are seen. Six main variables were captured during this study namely, the golf swing phase speed and golf club inclination angle (°) at each of the five golf phases, which are: Address, Top of Backswing, Start of Acceleration, Impact and Follow Through.
Four retro reflective markers were positioned on the golf club to ensure that the club points were visible on the video screen,in order for each motion system to track the participants’movement. All captured video was transferred to a Windows PC for later analysis of spatio-temporal parameters and kinematic data using the three AVPS software. All data was then imported into Microsoft Excel 2016 where the Mean,Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Means were calculated.A One Way ANOVA was also carried out to compare the differences between all AVPS software (Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro, SiliconCoach Live). Significance was set to P= 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere were no significant differences (P>0.05) shown between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Live and SiliconCoach Prosoftware (Swing Time: p=0.966, F=0.035; Vertical Angle at Address: P=0.732, F=0.314; Top of Backswing: P=0.994,F=0.006; Start of Acceleration: P=0.289, F=1.287; Impact:P=0.797, F=0.229; and Follow Through: P=0.809, F=0.214).
One insignificant difference was highlighted whilst comparing Kinovea against SiliconCoach Pro software at the vertical angle at the start of the acceleration phase. Kinovea (Mean: 75.4 ± 3.0o) and SiliconCoach Pro (Mean: 74.0 ± 3.6o) showed little comparative difference. This may have occurred as a result of a mild differentiation when calculating the start of the acceleration phase. McHardy and Pollard (2005) point out that the acceleration phase starts from the horizontal club to the impact of the ball (late part of down swing). 
Accurate identification of the start of this phase may prove to be problematic as the club is moving at speed and there are no physical objects or movements to calibrate against except the horizontal position of the club. This accuracy may be enhanced by using a horizontal linear backdrop to simplify the identification process.
CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study have clearly shown that there is no significant difference in output between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro and SiliconCoach Live when measuring the swing time and vertical angles during the five phases of a golf swing. Further studies should be carried out with a linear backdrop for marking ease. Studies are underway to evaluate clinical gait using the three AVPS software packages.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank staff at the University for their support throughout the study and the participants for their patience and professionalism. The staff at Myon are also acknowledged.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016)
Subtitle of host publicationAsian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016
EditorsJianshe Li, Yaodong Gu
PublisherIACSIT Press
Pages191-191
Number of pages1
ISBN (Print)978-981-09-9584-3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Costs
High speed cameras
Video cameras
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Software packages
Kinematics
Cameras
Monitoring
Motion analysis

Cite this

Hunter, H., Sorbie, G., Grace, F., Gu, Y., Baker, J. S., & Ugbolue, U. C. (2016). An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages. In J. Li, & Y. Gu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016): Asian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016 (pp. 191-191). [TC66] IACSIT Press.
Hunter, Henry ; Sorbie, Graeme ; Grace, Fergal ; Gu, Yaodong ; Baker, Julien S. ; Ugbolue, Ukadike Chris. / An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages. Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016): Asian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016. editor / Jianshe Li ; Yaodong Gu. IACSIT Press, 2016. pp. 191-191
@inproceedings{49e4d0c02c1f4aa1a906bd28e915d184,
title = "An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages",
abstract = "INTRODUCTIONTwo dimensional (2D) low cost, augmented video-based portable systems (AVPS) are commonly used for coaching in various sporting events to enhance performance as well as scientific or medical studies. Earlier works by Ugbolue et al,2013 have evaluated and validated the AVPS against the gold standard 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System using the 2D ProTrainer System software. This pilot study will compare the outputs of three popular AVPS software, SiliconCoachPro, SiliconCoach Live and Kinovea.To date, there have been no studies performed to evaluate and compare the lower limb parameters during a golf swing using these three AVPS software.METHODSTwelve healthy subjects participated in this study (Male: 6,Female: 6, Age: 22.5 ± 3.2 years, Weight: 76.7 ± 16.9kg).Participants were required to perform three golf swings whilst being recorded on the sagittal plane by a single, high speed video camera (240Hz). Wright (2008) describes past studies,which have used single cameras running at 200 frames per second, while monitoring golf motion captured in the sagittal plane. In this plane much movement of the club and arm swing technique are seen. Six main variables were captured during this study namely, the golf swing phase speed and golf club inclination angle (°) at each of the five golf phases, which are: Address, Top of Backswing, Start of Acceleration, Impact and Follow Through.Four retro reflective markers were positioned on the golf club to ensure that the club points were visible on the video screen,in order for each motion system to track the participants’movement. All captured video was transferred to a Windows PC for later analysis of spatio-temporal parameters and kinematic data using the three AVPS software. All data was then imported into Microsoft Excel 2016 where the Mean,Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Means were calculated.A One Way ANOVA was also carried out to compare the differences between all AVPS software (Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro, SiliconCoach Live). Significance was set to P= 0.05.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere were no significant differences (P>0.05) shown between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Live and SiliconCoach Prosoftware (Swing Time: p=0.966, F=0.035; Vertical Angle at Address: P=0.732, F=0.314; Top of Backswing: P=0.994,F=0.006; Start of Acceleration: P=0.289, F=1.287; Impact:P=0.797, F=0.229; and Follow Through: P=0.809, F=0.214).One insignificant difference was highlighted whilst comparing Kinovea against SiliconCoach Pro software at the vertical angle at the start of the acceleration phase. Kinovea (Mean: 75.4 ± 3.0o) and SiliconCoach Pro (Mean: 74.0 ± 3.6o) showed little comparative difference. This may have occurred as a result of a mild differentiation when calculating the start of the acceleration phase. McHardy and Pollard (2005) point out that the acceleration phase starts from the horizontal club to the impact of the ball (late part of down swing). Accurate identification of the start of this phase may prove to be problematic as the club is moving at speed and there are no physical objects or movements to calibrate against except the horizontal position of the club. This accuracy may be enhanced by using a horizontal linear backdrop to simplify the identification process.CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study have clearly shown that there is no significant difference in output between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro and SiliconCoach Live when measuring the swing time and vertical angles during the five phases of a golf swing. Further studies should be carried out with a linear backdrop for marking ease. Studies are underway to evaluate clinical gait using the three AVPS software packages.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank staff at the University for their support throughout the study and the participants for their patience and professionalism. The staff at Myon are also acknowledged.",
author = "Henry Hunter and Graeme Sorbie and Fergal Grace and Yaodong Gu and Baker, {Julien S.} and Ugbolue, {Ukadike Chris}",
note = "The sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics (ASSB 2016) Conference. 13-16 October 2016, Ningbo Fortune Bond Hotel, Ningbo, China",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-981-09-9584-3",
pages = "191--191",
editor = "Jianshe Li and Yaodong Gu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016)",
publisher = "IACSIT Press",
address = "Singapore",

}

Hunter, H, Sorbie, G, Grace, F, Gu, Y, Baker, JS & Ugbolue, UC 2016, An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages. in J Li & Y Gu (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016): Asian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016., TC66, IACSIT Press, pp. 191-191.

An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages. / Hunter, Henry; Sorbie, Graeme; Grace, Fergal; Gu, Yaodong; Baker, Julien S.; Ugbolue, Ukadike Chris.

Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016): Asian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016. ed. / Jianshe Li; Yaodong Gu. IACSIT Press, 2016. p. 191-191 TC66.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages

AU - Hunter, Henry

AU - Sorbie, Graeme

AU - Grace, Fergal

AU - Gu, Yaodong

AU - Baker, Julien S.

AU - Ugbolue, Ukadike Chris

N1 - The sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics (ASSB 2016) Conference. 13-16 October 2016, Ningbo Fortune Bond Hotel, Ningbo, China

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - INTRODUCTIONTwo dimensional (2D) low cost, augmented video-based portable systems (AVPS) are commonly used for coaching in various sporting events to enhance performance as well as scientific or medical studies. Earlier works by Ugbolue et al,2013 have evaluated and validated the AVPS against the gold standard 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System using the 2D ProTrainer System software. This pilot study will compare the outputs of three popular AVPS software, SiliconCoachPro, SiliconCoach Live and Kinovea.To date, there have been no studies performed to evaluate and compare the lower limb parameters during a golf swing using these three AVPS software.METHODSTwelve healthy subjects participated in this study (Male: 6,Female: 6, Age: 22.5 ± 3.2 years, Weight: 76.7 ± 16.9kg).Participants were required to perform three golf swings whilst being recorded on the sagittal plane by a single, high speed video camera (240Hz). Wright (2008) describes past studies,which have used single cameras running at 200 frames per second, while monitoring golf motion captured in the sagittal plane. In this plane much movement of the club and arm swing technique are seen. Six main variables were captured during this study namely, the golf swing phase speed and golf club inclination angle (°) at each of the five golf phases, which are: Address, Top of Backswing, Start of Acceleration, Impact and Follow Through.Four retro reflective markers were positioned on the golf club to ensure that the club points were visible on the video screen,in order for each motion system to track the participants’movement. All captured video was transferred to a Windows PC for later analysis of spatio-temporal parameters and kinematic data using the three AVPS software. All data was then imported into Microsoft Excel 2016 where the Mean,Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Means were calculated.A One Way ANOVA was also carried out to compare the differences between all AVPS software (Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro, SiliconCoach Live). Significance was set to P= 0.05.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere were no significant differences (P>0.05) shown between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Live and SiliconCoach Prosoftware (Swing Time: p=0.966, F=0.035; Vertical Angle at Address: P=0.732, F=0.314; Top of Backswing: P=0.994,F=0.006; Start of Acceleration: P=0.289, F=1.287; Impact:P=0.797, F=0.229; and Follow Through: P=0.809, F=0.214).One insignificant difference was highlighted whilst comparing Kinovea against SiliconCoach Pro software at the vertical angle at the start of the acceleration phase. Kinovea (Mean: 75.4 ± 3.0o) and SiliconCoach Pro (Mean: 74.0 ± 3.6o) showed little comparative difference. This may have occurred as a result of a mild differentiation when calculating the start of the acceleration phase. McHardy and Pollard (2005) point out that the acceleration phase starts from the horizontal club to the impact of the ball (late part of down swing). Accurate identification of the start of this phase may prove to be problematic as the club is moving at speed and there are no physical objects or movements to calibrate against except the horizontal position of the club. This accuracy may be enhanced by using a horizontal linear backdrop to simplify the identification process.CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study have clearly shown that there is no significant difference in output between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro and SiliconCoach Live when measuring the swing time and vertical angles during the five phases of a golf swing. Further studies should be carried out with a linear backdrop for marking ease. Studies are underway to evaluate clinical gait using the three AVPS software packages.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank staff at the University for their support throughout the study and the participants for their patience and professionalism. The staff at Myon are also acknowledged.

AB - INTRODUCTIONTwo dimensional (2D) low cost, augmented video-based portable systems (AVPS) are commonly used for coaching in various sporting events to enhance performance as well as scientific or medical studies. Earlier works by Ugbolue et al,2013 have evaluated and validated the AVPS against the gold standard 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System using the 2D ProTrainer System software. This pilot study will compare the outputs of three popular AVPS software, SiliconCoachPro, SiliconCoach Live and Kinovea.To date, there have been no studies performed to evaluate and compare the lower limb parameters during a golf swing using these three AVPS software.METHODSTwelve healthy subjects participated in this study (Male: 6,Female: 6, Age: 22.5 ± 3.2 years, Weight: 76.7 ± 16.9kg).Participants were required to perform three golf swings whilst being recorded on the sagittal plane by a single, high speed video camera (240Hz). Wright (2008) describes past studies,which have used single cameras running at 200 frames per second, while monitoring golf motion captured in the sagittal plane. In this plane much movement of the club and arm swing technique are seen. Six main variables were captured during this study namely, the golf swing phase speed and golf club inclination angle (°) at each of the five golf phases, which are: Address, Top of Backswing, Start of Acceleration, Impact and Follow Through.Four retro reflective markers were positioned on the golf club to ensure that the club points were visible on the video screen,in order for each motion system to track the participants’movement. All captured video was transferred to a Windows PC for later analysis of spatio-temporal parameters and kinematic data using the three AVPS software. All data was then imported into Microsoft Excel 2016 where the Mean,Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Means were calculated.A One Way ANOVA was also carried out to compare the differences between all AVPS software (Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro, SiliconCoach Live). Significance was set to P= 0.05.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere were no significant differences (P>0.05) shown between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Live and SiliconCoach Prosoftware (Swing Time: p=0.966, F=0.035; Vertical Angle at Address: P=0.732, F=0.314; Top of Backswing: P=0.994,F=0.006; Start of Acceleration: P=0.289, F=1.287; Impact:P=0.797, F=0.229; and Follow Through: P=0.809, F=0.214).One insignificant difference was highlighted whilst comparing Kinovea against SiliconCoach Pro software at the vertical angle at the start of the acceleration phase. Kinovea (Mean: 75.4 ± 3.0o) and SiliconCoach Pro (Mean: 74.0 ± 3.6o) showed little comparative difference. This may have occurred as a result of a mild differentiation when calculating the start of the acceleration phase. McHardy and Pollard (2005) point out that the acceleration phase starts from the horizontal club to the impact of the ball (late part of down swing). Accurate identification of the start of this phase may prove to be problematic as the club is moving at speed and there are no physical objects or movements to calibrate against except the horizontal position of the club. This accuracy may be enhanced by using a horizontal linear backdrop to simplify the identification process.CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study have clearly shown that there is no significant difference in output between Kinovea, SiliconCoach Pro and SiliconCoach Live when measuring the swing time and vertical angles during the five phases of a golf swing. Further studies should be carried out with a linear backdrop for marking ease. Studies are underway to evaluate clinical gait using the three AVPS software packages.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank staff at the University for their support throughout the study and the participants for their patience and professionalism. The staff at Myon are also acknowledged.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-981-09-9584-3

SP - 191

EP - 191

BT - Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016)

A2 - Li, Jianshe

A2 - Gu, Yaodong

PB - IACSIT Press

ER -

Hunter H, Sorbie G, Grace F, Gu Y, Baker JS, Ugbolue UC. An evaluation of club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages. In Li J, Gu Y, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Society of Sport Biomechanics Conference (ASSB 2016): Asian Sport Biomechanics Research Trend, Ningbo, China, October. 13-16, 2016. IACSIT Press. 2016. p. 191-191. TC66