An ethnographic exploration of homophobic chants in English Premier League Stadia: the paradox of being accepted and included

Mia Claydon, Chris Mackintosh*, Rebecca O'Hanlon, Ryan Storr, Jess Williams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Through first-hand experiences, observation, and an adapted theoretical framework using concepts devised by Goffman (1959, 1969), this study investigates how fans view homophobic chants within football stadiums. The core theoretical concepts of dramaturgy, impression management and ‘front stage’ and ‘backstage’ regions of performance have been used to help conceptualise the data collected through participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The research aim for this project was to critically explore homophobic chants in the English Premier League (EPL), through the perspective of male, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other sexually diverse people (LGBTQ+) football fans aged 18-35 years old. The novelty of this study lies in the exploration of how specifically male identifying LGBTQ+ football fans perceive homophobia and chant-based abuse during football matches. Findings included fear of safety prevented challenging homophobia in the stands, and ‘frontstage’ performances that were used. The paper introduces a new theoretical concept of the acceptance and inclusion paradox in the context of male gay football fans in England and considers how 1 this may provide a useful exploratory tool for exploring nuances and transgressive behaviours around accepting homophobia.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalManaging Sport and Leisure
Early online date29 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • LGBTQ+
  • football
  • fandom
  • social justice
  • national governing body

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ethnographic exploration of homophobic chants in English Premier League Stadia: the paradox of being accepted and included'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this