Ambivalent sexism, right wing authoritarianism and rape myth acceptance in Scotland

Kalliopi Manoussaki, Fiona Veitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study investigated the relationship between ambivalent sexism (AS), right wing authoritarianism (RWA) and rape myth acceptance (RMA) in a Scottish context. Findings revealed that benevolent (BS) and hostile sexism (HS) as well as RWA significantly predicted rape myth acceptance. Analysis of gender differences revealed that males and females performed significantly differently on all the subscales of the IRMA-SF (Payne, Lonsway and Fitzgerald, 1999) and on the HS subscale of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) (Glick and Fisk, 1996). No gender differences were found on the RWA Scale (Altemeyer, 1996) or on the BS subscale of the ASI. The findings were placed in a wider theoretical context and discussed in relation to political and policy developments in Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-100
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Gender & Women's Studies
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ambivalent sexism, right wing authoritarianism and rape myth acceptance in Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this