AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond

Deborah Johnson, Mario Verdicchio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)
    217 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The concept of agency as applied to technological artifacts has become an object of heated debate in the context of AI research because some AI researchers ascribe to programs the type of agency traditionally associated with humans. Confusion about agency is at the root of misconceptions about the possibilities for future AI. We introduce the concept of a triadic agency that includes the causal agency of artifacts and the intentional agency of humans to better describe what happens in AI as it functions in real-world contexts. We use the VW emission fraud case to explain triadic agency since in this case a techno-logical artifact, namely software, was an essential part of the wrongdoing and the software might be said to have agency in the wrongdoing. We then extend the case to include futuristic AI, imagining AI that becomes more and more autonomous.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)639-647
    Number of pages9
    JournalAI & Society
    Volume34
    Issue number3
    Early online date11 Jan 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2019

    Keywords

    • Agency
    • Autonomy
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics
    • Future
    • Technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this