Achieving evidence-based nursing practice: impact of the Caledonian Development Model

Debbie Tolson, Joanne Booth, Andrew Lowndes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice.

BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college.

METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months.

RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach.

CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)682-91
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Nursing Management
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Nursing
Evidence-Based Practice
Nurses
Nursing
Learning
Time Management
Benchmarking
Translational Medical Research
Standard of Care
Focus Groups

Keywords

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Benchmarking
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Evidence-Based Nursing
  • Focus Groups
  • Geriatric Nursing
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Models, Nursing
  • Nurse's Role
  • Nursing Audit
  • Nursing Evaluation Research
  • Nursing Methodology Research
  • Nursing Research
  • Nursing Staff
  • Professional Autonomy
  • Qualitative Research
  • Scotland
  • Social Support
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{c2d047faa96d4c41a0ff08323fd56f67,
title = "Achieving evidence-based nursing practice: impact of the Caledonian Development Model",
abstract = "AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice.BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college.METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months.RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35{\%} of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach.CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.",
keywords = "Attitude of Health Personnel, Benchmarking, Diffusion of Innovation, Evidence-Based Nursing, Focus Groups, Geriatric Nursing, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Models, Nursing, Nurse's Role, Nursing Audit, Nursing Evaluation Research, Nursing Methodology Research, Nursing Research, Nursing Staff, Professional Autonomy, Qualitative Research, Scotland, Social Support, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Debbie Tolson and Joanne Booth and Andrew Lowndes",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00889.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "682--91",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Management",
issn = "0966-0429",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

Achieving evidence-based nursing practice : impact of the Caledonian Development Model. / Tolson, Debbie; Booth, Joanne; Lowndes, Andrew.

In: Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 16, No. 6, 09.2008, p. 682-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Achieving evidence-based nursing practice

T2 - impact of the Caledonian Development Model

AU - Tolson, Debbie

AU - Booth, Joanne

AU - Lowndes, Andrew

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice.BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college.METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months.RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach.CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.

AB - AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice.BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college.METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months.RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach.CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Diffusion of Innovation

KW - Evidence-Based Nursing

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Geriatric Nursing

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Models, Nursing

KW - Nurse's Role

KW - Nursing Audit

KW - Nursing Evaluation Research

KW - Nursing Methodology Research

KW - Nursing Research

KW - Nursing Staff

KW - Professional Autonomy

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Scotland

KW - Social Support

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00889.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00889.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 682

EP - 691

JO - Journal of Nursing Management

JF - Journal of Nursing Management

SN - 0966-0429

IS - 6

ER -