Abiding by the rules? A sequential mixed-methods study on the determinants of regulatory compliance with maritime environmental legislation

Thea Freese, Michael Gille, John Struthers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose
Increased political measures to protect the marine environment addresses a shipping industry characterised by strained financial resources, excess supply of capacity and consolidation. In addition, 5-15 per cent of industry participants are believed by shipping experts to neglect rules on vessel-source pollution to stay competitive within their industry and vis-à-vis other transport modes. This study aims to identify and quantify cost effects of maritime environmental legislation, to relate these with company characteristics and to investigate the impact of regulatory compliance.

Design/methodology/approach
A mixed-methods design was used to develop both a theoretical model of compliance costs effects and to quantify effect sizes. In total, 12 in-depth exploratory expert interviews were conducted and analysed. A theoretical framework emerged, which was evaluated, strengthened and fed with quantitative data from questionnaire data by 120 shipping companies. Partial least squares analysis was conducted to determine compliance cost effects.

Findings
It was found that organisational capacities played a significant role in determining compliance behaviour. Exterior determinants showed no significant correlation with legal compliance. This is a striking result, as it does not support achieving legal compliance with measures of strong enforcement.

Social implications
European transport policy-making depends on scientifically sound studies on the impact of policy. An in-depth impact assessment on environmental legislation for the maritime industry highlights mechanisms applicable to environmental policy-making in transport and helps in building policy that considers compliance concerns, company characteristics and the interconnectedness of different transport modes for a sound response to the tragedy of the commons.

Originality/value
Originality lies in the inductive development of a comprehensive theory on shipping companies’ legal compliance behaviour and the empirical testing of this theory. Further value is derived from applying a sequential mixed-methods approach to the research problem, showing both the worth and challenge in combining different methodologies to achieve sound research results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-48
Number of pages18
JournalMaritime Business Review
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Mixed methods
Environmental legislation
Regulatory compliance
Shipping
Industry
Policy making
Compliance costs
Design methodology
Maritime industry
Theoretical framework
Marine environment
Transport policy
Costs
Financial resources
Consolidation
Neglect
Effect size
Tragedy of the commons
Impact assessment
Enforcement

Keywords

  • Regulatory compliance
  • Marine environmental protection
  • Mixed-methods research
  • Compliance costs
  • Clean vessel operations
  • North and Baltic sea shipping

Cite this

@article{e653f3ed635e4c3bb4484fdc6d4e5ddf,
title = "Abiding by the rules? A sequential mixed-methods study on the determinants of regulatory compliance with maritime environmental legislation",
abstract = "PurposeIncreased political measures to protect the marine environment addresses a shipping industry characterised by strained financial resources, excess supply of capacity and consolidation. In addition, 5-15 per cent of industry participants are believed by shipping experts to neglect rules on vessel-source pollution to stay competitive within their industry and vis-{\`a}-vis other transport modes. This study aims to identify and quantify cost effects of maritime environmental legislation, to relate these with company characteristics and to investigate the impact of regulatory compliance.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods design was used to develop both a theoretical model of compliance costs effects and to quantify effect sizes. In total, 12 in-depth exploratory expert interviews were conducted and analysed. A theoretical framework emerged, which was evaluated, strengthened and fed with quantitative data from questionnaire data by 120 shipping companies. Partial least squares analysis was conducted to determine compliance cost effects.FindingsIt was found that organisational capacities played a significant role in determining compliance behaviour. Exterior determinants showed no significant correlation with legal compliance. This is a striking result, as it does not support achieving legal compliance with measures of strong enforcement.Social implicationsEuropean transport policy-making depends on scientifically sound studies on the impact of policy. An in-depth impact assessment on environmental legislation for the maritime industry highlights mechanisms applicable to environmental policy-making in transport and helps in building policy that considers compliance concerns, company characteristics and the interconnectedness of different transport modes for a sound response to the tragedy of the commons.Originality/valueOriginality lies in the inductive development of a comprehensive theory on shipping companies’ legal compliance behaviour and the empirical testing of this theory. Further value is derived from applying a sequential mixed-methods approach to the research problem, showing both the worth and challenge in combining different methodologies to achieve sound research results.",
keywords = "Regulatory compliance, Marine environmental protection, Mixed-methods research, Compliance costs, Clean vessel operations, North and Baltic sea shipping",
author = "Thea Freese and Michael Gille and John Struthers",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1108/MABR-09-2018-0034",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "31--48",
journal = "Maritime Business Review",
issn = "2397-3757",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Abiding by the rules? A sequential mixed-methods study on the determinants of regulatory compliance with maritime environmental legislation. / Freese, Thea; Gille, Michael; Struthers, John.

In: Maritime Business Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 18.03.2019, p. 31-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abiding by the rules? A sequential mixed-methods study on the determinants of regulatory compliance with maritime environmental legislation

AU - Freese, Thea

AU - Gille, Michael

AU - Struthers, John

PY - 2019/3/18

Y1 - 2019/3/18

N2 - PurposeIncreased political measures to protect the marine environment addresses a shipping industry characterised by strained financial resources, excess supply of capacity and consolidation. In addition, 5-15 per cent of industry participants are believed by shipping experts to neglect rules on vessel-source pollution to stay competitive within their industry and vis-à-vis other transport modes. This study aims to identify and quantify cost effects of maritime environmental legislation, to relate these with company characteristics and to investigate the impact of regulatory compliance.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods design was used to develop both a theoretical model of compliance costs effects and to quantify effect sizes. In total, 12 in-depth exploratory expert interviews were conducted and analysed. A theoretical framework emerged, which was evaluated, strengthened and fed with quantitative data from questionnaire data by 120 shipping companies. Partial least squares analysis was conducted to determine compliance cost effects.FindingsIt was found that organisational capacities played a significant role in determining compliance behaviour. Exterior determinants showed no significant correlation with legal compliance. This is a striking result, as it does not support achieving legal compliance with measures of strong enforcement.Social implicationsEuropean transport policy-making depends on scientifically sound studies on the impact of policy. An in-depth impact assessment on environmental legislation for the maritime industry highlights mechanisms applicable to environmental policy-making in transport and helps in building policy that considers compliance concerns, company characteristics and the interconnectedness of different transport modes for a sound response to the tragedy of the commons.Originality/valueOriginality lies in the inductive development of a comprehensive theory on shipping companies’ legal compliance behaviour and the empirical testing of this theory. Further value is derived from applying a sequential mixed-methods approach to the research problem, showing both the worth and challenge in combining different methodologies to achieve sound research results.

AB - PurposeIncreased political measures to protect the marine environment addresses a shipping industry characterised by strained financial resources, excess supply of capacity and consolidation. In addition, 5-15 per cent of industry participants are believed by shipping experts to neglect rules on vessel-source pollution to stay competitive within their industry and vis-à-vis other transport modes. This study aims to identify and quantify cost effects of maritime environmental legislation, to relate these with company characteristics and to investigate the impact of regulatory compliance.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods design was used to develop both a theoretical model of compliance costs effects and to quantify effect sizes. In total, 12 in-depth exploratory expert interviews were conducted and analysed. A theoretical framework emerged, which was evaluated, strengthened and fed with quantitative data from questionnaire data by 120 shipping companies. Partial least squares analysis was conducted to determine compliance cost effects.FindingsIt was found that organisational capacities played a significant role in determining compliance behaviour. Exterior determinants showed no significant correlation with legal compliance. This is a striking result, as it does not support achieving legal compliance with measures of strong enforcement.Social implicationsEuropean transport policy-making depends on scientifically sound studies on the impact of policy. An in-depth impact assessment on environmental legislation for the maritime industry highlights mechanisms applicable to environmental policy-making in transport and helps in building policy that considers compliance concerns, company characteristics and the interconnectedness of different transport modes for a sound response to the tragedy of the commons.Originality/valueOriginality lies in the inductive development of a comprehensive theory on shipping companies’ legal compliance behaviour and the empirical testing of this theory. Further value is derived from applying a sequential mixed-methods approach to the research problem, showing both the worth and challenge in combining different methodologies to achieve sound research results.

KW - Regulatory compliance

KW - Marine environmental protection

KW - Mixed-methods research

KW - Compliance costs

KW - Clean vessel operations

KW - North and Baltic sea shipping

U2 - 10.1108/MABR-09-2018-0034

DO - 10.1108/MABR-09-2018-0034

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 31

EP - 48

JO - Maritime Business Review

JF - Maritime Business Review

SN - 2397-3757

IS - 1

ER -