A semi-open supervision systems model for evaluating staff supervision in adult care organisational settings: the research findings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper offers an original examination of the interrelationship between organizational arrangements, supervisory practices, and outcomes from supervision in a study funded by the Social Care Institute for Excellence. The study aimed to capture examples of good supervision. Researcher’s used systems theory to develop a supervision model, which informed the research design and evaluation (Lambley, 2018). Good supervision was identified by 136 on-line survey participants, and all emerging themes were examined in 19 interviews, within four case study settings. Social workers within an ‘integrated’ case study setting and health workers in a ‘partnership’ setting, said that ‘good’ supervision was supported by organisational policies, supervisor training, and devolved management and professional practice. In the care home and social enterprise settings, supervision was similarly supported, but its delivery was a management performance target. In all four case study settings, good supervision could be negatively transformed by a supervisor’s action (e.g., rigid responses to performance issues) or supervisor’s inaction (e.g., cancelled supervision sessions). Service user feedback on supervision is an underdeveloped area that needs further research. This paper concludes by considering the implications of the research findings for the study of supervision.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberbcy069
Pages (from-to)391-410
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date9 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

system model
supervision
staff
Research
Organizational Policy
Systems Theory
Professional Practice
system theory
Home Care Services
online survey
home care
management
research planning
performance
social worker
Research Design
Research Personnel
Interviews
worker
examination

Keywords

  • clinical supervision
  • professional supervision
  • management supervision
  • adult care
  • service users

Cite this

@article{0fde2dc9c4e54fdea30d897589f3dd48,
title = "A semi-open supervision systems model for evaluating staff supervision in adult care organisational settings: the research findings",
abstract = "This paper offers an original examination of the interrelationship between organizational arrangements, supervisory practices, and outcomes from supervision in a study funded by the Social Care Institute for Excellence. The study aimed to capture examples of good supervision. Researcher’s used systems theory to develop a supervision model, which informed the research design and evaluation (Lambley, 2018). Good supervision was identified by 136 on-line survey participants, and all emerging themes were examined in 19 interviews, within four case study settings. Social workers within an ‘integrated’ case study setting and health workers in a ‘partnership’ setting, said that ‘good’ supervision was supported by organisational policies, supervisor training, and devolved management and professional practice. In the care home and social enterprise settings, supervision was similarly supported, but its delivery was a management performance target. In all four case study settings, good supervision could be negatively transformed by a supervisor’s action (e.g., rigid responses to performance issues) or supervisor’s inaction (e.g., cancelled supervision sessions). Service user feedback on supervision is an underdeveloped area that needs further research. This paper concludes by considering the implications of the research findings for the study of supervision.",
keywords = "clinical supervision, professional supervision, management supervision, adult care, service users",
author = "Sharon Lambley",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcy069",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "391--410",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A semi-open supervision systems model for evaluating staff supervision in adult care organisational settings

T2 - the research findings

AU - Lambley, Sharon

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - This paper offers an original examination of the interrelationship between organizational arrangements, supervisory practices, and outcomes from supervision in a study funded by the Social Care Institute for Excellence. The study aimed to capture examples of good supervision. Researcher’s used systems theory to develop a supervision model, which informed the research design and evaluation (Lambley, 2018). Good supervision was identified by 136 on-line survey participants, and all emerging themes were examined in 19 interviews, within four case study settings. Social workers within an ‘integrated’ case study setting and health workers in a ‘partnership’ setting, said that ‘good’ supervision was supported by organisational policies, supervisor training, and devolved management and professional practice. In the care home and social enterprise settings, supervision was similarly supported, but its delivery was a management performance target. In all four case study settings, good supervision could be negatively transformed by a supervisor’s action (e.g., rigid responses to performance issues) or supervisor’s inaction (e.g., cancelled supervision sessions). Service user feedback on supervision is an underdeveloped area that needs further research. This paper concludes by considering the implications of the research findings for the study of supervision.

AB - This paper offers an original examination of the interrelationship between organizational arrangements, supervisory practices, and outcomes from supervision in a study funded by the Social Care Institute for Excellence. The study aimed to capture examples of good supervision. Researcher’s used systems theory to develop a supervision model, which informed the research design and evaluation (Lambley, 2018). Good supervision was identified by 136 on-line survey participants, and all emerging themes were examined in 19 interviews, within four case study settings. Social workers within an ‘integrated’ case study setting and health workers in a ‘partnership’ setting, said that ‘good’ supervision was supported by organisational policies, supervisor training, and devolved management and professional practice. In the care home and social enterprise settings, supervision was similarly supported, but its delivery was a management performance target. In all four case study settings, good supervision could be negatively transformed by a supervisor’s action (e.g., rigid responses to performance issues) or supervisor’s inaction (e.g., cancelled supervision sessions). Service user feedback on supervision is an underdeveloped area that needs further research. This paper concludes by considering the implications of the research findings for the study of supervision.

KW - clinical supervision

KW - professional supervision

KW - management supervision

KW - adult care

KW - service users

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcy069

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcy069

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 391

EP - 410

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 2

M1 - bcy069

ER -