A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943–2006): part two—experimental writing

Jeff Hooper, Tony Wigram, Derek Carson, Bill Lindsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper begins by looking at musical aptitude. It identifies research that compared the musical aptitude of people with, and without, an intellectual disability, and investigations that assessed the musical aptitude of diagnostic subgroups from within the intellectual disability population (Down syndrome, musical savants, autistic spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome). This paper then goes on to consider research that examined how individuals with an intellectual disability responded to active (improvisation, and Music Activity Therapy) and receptive (contingent, contingent-interrupted, and non-contingent music) interventions. The studies are ordered according to therapeutic outcome, and it describes their method, and considers various issues that arose. The conclusion summarises the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental writing, and identifies agendas for music therapy research with this population. It argues that the experimental research should not be considered in isolation. Instead, it suggests, that along with the descriptive writing (discussed in part one of the review), the experimental writing is part of a body of work that captures both the richness of clinical experiences, and the cause-effect relationships underlying those experiences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-96
Number of pages17
JournalMusic Therapy Perspectives
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Music
Intellectual Disability
Aptitude
Music Therapy
Research
Williams Syndrome
Autistic Disorder
Down Syndrome
Population
Contingent
Therapeutics

Cite this

Hooper, Jeff ; Wigram, Tony ; Carson, Derek ; Lindsay, Bill. / A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943–2006) : part two—experimental writing. In: Music Therapy Perspectives. 2008 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 80-96.
@article{820ab475aa154eeaba14729684427515,
title = "A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943–2006): part two—experimental writing",
abstract = "This paper begins by looking at musical aptitude. It identifies research that compared the musical aptitude of people with, and without, an intellectual disability, and investigations that assessed the musical aptitude of diagnostic subgroups from within the intellectual disability population (Down syndrome, musical savants, autistic spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome). This paper then goes on to consider research that examined how individuals with an intellectual disability responded to active (improvisation, and Music Activity Therapy) and receptive (contingent, contingent-interrupted, and non-contingent music) interventions. The studies are ordered according to therapeutic outcome, and it describes their method, and considers various issues that arose. The conclusion summarises the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental writing, and identifies agendas for music therapy research with this population. It argues that the experimental research should not be considered in isolation. Instead, it suggests, that along with the descriptive writing (discussed in part one of the review), the experimental writing is part of a body of work that captures both the richness of clinical experiences, and the cause-effect relationships underlying those experiences.",
author = "Jeff Hooper and Tony Wigram and Derek Carson and Bill Lindsay",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/mtp/26.2.80",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "80--96",
journal = "Music Therapy Perspectives",
issn = "0734-6875",
publisher = "American Music Therapy Association, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943–2006) : part two—experimental writing. / Hooper, Jeff; Wigram, Tony; Carson, Derek; Lindsay, Bill.

In: Music Therapy Perspectives, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, p. 80-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943–2006)

T2 - part two—experimental writing

AU - Hooper, Jeff

AU - Wigram, Tony

AU - Carson, Derek

AU - Lindsay, Bill

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper begins by looking at musical aptitude. It identifies research that compared the musical aptitude of people with, and without, an intellectual disability, and investigations that assessed the musical aptitude of diagnostic subgroups from within the intellectual disability population (Down syndrome, musical savants, autistic spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome). This paper then goes on to consider research that examined how individuals with an intellectual disability responded to active (improvisation, and Music Activity Therapy) and receptive (contingent, contingent-interrupted, and non-contingent music) interventions. The studies are ordered according to therapeutic outcome, and it describes their method, and considers various issues that arose. The conclusion summarises the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental writing, and identifies agendas for music therapy research with this population. It argues that the experimental research should not be considered in isolation. Instead, it suggests, that along with the descriptive writing (discussed in part one of the review), the experimental writing is part of a body of work that captures both the richness of clinical experiences, and the cause-effect relationships underlying those experiences.

AB - This paper begins by looking at musical aptitude. It identifies research that compared the musical aptitude of people with, and without, an intellectual disability, and investigations that assessed the musical aptitude of diagnostic subgroups from within the intellectual disability population (Down syndrome, musical savants, autistic spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome). This paper then goes on to consider research that examined how individuals with an intellectual disability responded to active (improvisation, and Music Activity Therapy) and receptive (contingent, contingent-interrupted, and non-contingent music) interventions. The studies are ordered according to therapeutic outcome, and it describes their method, and considers various issues that arose. The conclusion summarises the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental writing, and identifies agendas for music therapy research with this population. It argues that the experimental research should not be considered in isolation. Instead, it suggests, that along with the descriptive writing (discussed in part one of the review), the experimental writing is part of a body of work that captures both the richness of clinical experiences, and the cause-effect relationships underlying those experiences.

U2 - 10.1093/mtp/26.2.80

DO - 10.1093/mtp/26.2.80

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 80

EP - 96

JO - Music Therapy Perspectives

JF - Music Therapy Perspectives

SN - 0734-6875

IS - 2

ER -