A review of professionalism within LIS

Paul Cannon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of professionalism within Library and Information Science (LIS) and in doing so draw comparisons with the education and medicine professions.

    Design/methodology/approach
    The paper provides a review of the extant literature from the three professions and gives a brief review of the theoretical constructs of professional knowledge using the work of Eisner and Eraut to explore knowledge types. It then relates these definitions to knowledge use within LIS, education and medicine, before examining the roles that professional associations have on the knowledge development of a profession. It concludes with a reflection on the future of professionalism within LIS.

    Findings
    The literature suggests a fragmented epistemological knowledge-base and threats to its practices from outside professions. It does, however, find opportunities to redefine its knowledge boundaries within the phronetic practices of LIS and in socio-cultural uses of knowledge. It finds strengths and weaknesses in professionalism within LIS and its practitioners.

    Originality/value
    This review provides a contemporary update to several earlier, related, works and provides useful context to current efforts to professionalise LIS by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)142-152
    Number of pages11
    JournalLibrary Management
    Volume38
    Issue number2-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2017

    Keywords

    • ethics
    • professionalism
    • professional associations
    • Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP)
    • professional knowledge

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A review of professionalism within LIS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this