A note on the psychometric properties of the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine some psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford's (1992 The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey) Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) and therefore its potential utility for accounting education research. Prior research in other cognate disciplines (managers; US business undergraduates) suggests that the LSQ may be preferable to Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI) and Revised LSI. However, little measurement information exists regarding the application of the LSQ in higher education. The present study uses samples of undergraduate accounting students (N = 127) at a UK university. Evidence of only modest internal consistency reliability is reported. The construct validity of the scores produced by the instrument is not supported by the results of the present study. Limitations and implications for the use of the LSQ by accounting education researchers are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-197
Number of pages13
JournalAccounting Education
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2001

Fingerprint

psychometrics
questionnaire
learning
education
construct validity
Questionnaire
Psychometrics
Learning styles
manager
university
evidence
student

Keywords

  • Learning styles questionnaire
  • Learning styles
  • Experimental learning model
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Cite this

@article{e5b6e899119b44659711d32a7cbffd64,
title = "A note on the psychometric properties of the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ)",
abstract = "The objective of this study is to examine some psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford's (1992 The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey) Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) and therefore its potential utility for accounting education research. Prior research in other cognate disciplines (managers; US business undergraduates) suggests that the LSQ may be preferable to Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI) and Revised LSI. However, little measurement information exists regarding the application of the LSQ in higher education. The present study uses samples of undergraduate accounting students (N = 127) at a UK university. Evidence of only modest internal consistency reliability is reported. The construct validity of the scores produced by the instrument is not supported by the results of the present study. Limitations and implications for the use of the LSQ by accounting education researchers are discussed.",
keywords = "Learning styles questionnaire, Learning styles, Experimental learning model, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Angus Duff",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09639280110095764",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "185--197",
journal = "Accounting Education",
issn = "0963-9284",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

A note on the psychometric properties of the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ). / Duff, Angus.

In: Accounting Education, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2001, p. 185-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on the psychometric properties of the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ)

AU - Duff, Angus

PY - 2001/6/1

Y1 - 2001/6/1

N2 - The objective of this study is to examine some psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford's (1992 The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey) Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) and therefore its potential utility for accounting education research. Prior research in other cognate disciplines (managers; US business undergraduates) suggests that the LSQ may be preferable to Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI) and Revised LSI. However, little measurement information exists regarding the application of the LSQ in higher education. The present study uses samples of undergraduate accounting students (N = 127) at a UK university. Evidence of only modest internal consistency reliability is reported. The construct validity of the scores produced by the instrument is not supported by the results of the present study. Limitations and implications for the use of the LSQ by accounting education researchers are discussed.

AB - The objective of this study is to examine some psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford's (1992 The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey) Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) and therefore its potential utility for accounting education research. Prior research in other cognate disciplines (managers; US business undergraduates) suggests that the LSQ may be preferable to Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI) and Revised LSI. However, little measurement information exists regarding the application of the LSQ in higher education. The present study uses samples of undergraduate accounting students (N = 127) at a UK university. Evidence of only modest internal consistency reliability is reported. The construct validity of the scores produced by the instrument is not supported by the results of the present study. Limitations and implications for the use of the LSQ by accounting education researchers are discussed.

KW - Learning styles questionnaire

KW - Learning styles

KW - Experimental learning model

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

U2 - 10.1080/09639280110095764

DO - 10.1080/09639280110095764

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 185

EP - 197

JO - Accounting Education

JF - Accounting Education

SN - 0963-9284

IS - 2

ER -