A kinematics analysis of the lower limb during running with different sports shoes

Lin Fu, Yaodong Gu, Qichang Mei, Julien S Baker, Justin Fernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the differences in lower limb joint angles during running with three different sports shoes: basketball shoes, football shoes, and running shoes. Fifteen male subjects (age: 25 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.05 m, and mass: 70.8 ± 3.4 kg) were asked to run on a treadmill at their preferred running speed. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to capture the kinematics of the lower extremity during running. A one-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether any statistical significance existed between the three types of shoes (α < 0.05). Significant differences existed in the lower limb joints between the three sports shoes, particularly at the knee joint. Running shoes presented more knee flexion than basketball shoes and football shoes. In the frontal plane, basketball shoes showed less knee abduction than running shoes and football shoes. No significant difference occurred in ankle external rotation between basketball shoes and football shoes, and both of them presented greater range of motion of the ankle and knee than running shoes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Early online date9 Jul 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 9 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Shoes
Biomechanical Phenomena
Running
Sports
Lower Extremity
Basketball
Football
Knee
Ankle
Joints
Knee Joint
Articular Range of Motion

Keywords

  • Kinematics
  • Sports shoes
  • Running
  • Gait analysis
  • injury

Cite this

@article{4b66ef000bb1402eb5ddc3c5f4342656,
title = "A kinematics analysis of the lower limb during running with different sports shoes",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the differences in lower limb joint angles during running with three different sports shoes: basketball shoes, football shoes, and running shoes. Fifteen male subjects (age: 25 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.05 m, and mass: 70.8 ± 3.4 kg) were asked to run on a treadmill at their preferred running speed. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to capture the kinematics of the lower extremity during running. A one-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether any statistical significance existed between the three types of shoes (α < 0.05). Significant differences existed in the lower limb joints between the three sports shoes, particularly at the knee joint. Running shoes presented more knee flexion than basketball shoes and football shoes. In the frontal plane, basketball shoes showed less knee abduction than running shoes and football shoes. No significant difference occurred in ankle external rotation between basketball shoes and football shoes, and both of them presented greater range of motion of the ankle and knee than running shoes.",
keywords = "Kinematics, Sports shoes, Running, Gait analysis, injury",
author = "Lin Fu and Yaodong Gu and Qichang Mei and Baker, {Julien S} and Justin Fernandez",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1754337118784415",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology",
issn = "1754-3371",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A kinematics analysis of the lower limb during running with different sports shoes

AU - Fu,Lin

AU - Gu,Yaodong

AU - Mei,Qichang

AU - Baker,Julien S

AU - Fernandez,Justin

PY - 2018/7/9

Y1 - 2018/7/9

N2 - The study aimed to investigate the differences in lower limb joint angles during running with three different sports shoes: basketball shoes, football shoes, and running shoes. Fifteen male subjects (age: 25 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.05 m, and mass: 70.8 ± 3.4 kg) were asked to run on a treadmill at their preferred running speed. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to capture the kinematics of the lower extremity during running. A one-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether any statistical significance existed between the three types of shoes (α < 0.05). Significant differences existed in the lower limb joints between the three sports shoes, particularly at the knee joint. Running shoes presented more knee flexion than basketball shoes and football shoes. In the frontal plane, basketball shoes showed less knee abduction than running shoes and football shoes. No significant difference occurred in ankle external rotation between basketball shoes and football shoes, and both of them presented greater range of motion of the ankle and knee than running shoes.

AB - The study aimed to investigate the differences in lower limb joint angles during running with three different sports shoes: basketball shoes, football shoes, and running shoes. Fifteen male subjects (age: 25 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.05 m, and mass: 70.8 ± 3.4 kg) were asked to run on a treadmill at their preferred running speed. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to capture the kinematics of the lower extremity during running. A one-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether any statistical significance existed between the three types of shoes (α < 0.05). Significant differences existed in the lower limb joints between the three sports shoes, particularly at the knee joint. Running shoes presented more knee flexion than basketball shoes and football shoes. In the frontal plane, basketball shoes showed less knee abduction than running shoes and football shoes. No significant difference occurred in ankle external rotation between basketball shoes and football shoes, and both of them presented greater range of motion of the ankle and knee than running shoes.

KW - Kinematics

KW - Sports shoes

KW - Running

KW - Gait analysis

KW - injury

U2 - 10.1177/1754337118784415

DO - 10.1177/1754337118784415

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology

T2 - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology

SN - 1754-3371

ER -