Abstract
Exercise physiology, in terms of the history of biological sciences, is quite young and has a rather tumultuous history - as it spans physical education, health & medicine, sport science, and biology. This has led to the development of differing definitions, research approaches, practices and goals. This is easily seen in the presence of competing and non-universally adopted definitions of fitness. Such internal inconsistencies portray to the outside world a discipline experiencing the problems associated with a changing paradigm. Every science requires the presence of a paradigm that both describes and guides the evolution of thinking, experimentation, and the application of such. It is argued here that exercise physiology has been operating without benefit of a satisfactory and relevant paradigm. A further proposition is that the required disciplinary definitions derived from an articulated paradigm are also absent. A paradigmatic scheme based on biological dogma is presented along with proposed definitions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 314-322 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Research in Sports Medicine |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Jun 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Biomedical Research
- Exercise
- Humans
- Physical Fitness
- Sports Medicine
- Journal Article