A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights

David McGillivray, Michael B. Edwards, Ian Brittain, Jason Bocarro, Joerg Koenigstorfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, the authors propose a framework for how progressive human rights outcomes may be obtained in the context of bidding, planning and implementing major sport events (MSEs) through the implementation of four pathways, including good governance, the democratic participation of stakeholders, the formalisation of human rights agendas, and the deployment of sensitive urban development. The authors argue that there is a need for adherence to internationally recognised standards, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights if rhetorical statements from MSE awarding bodies and host organisers are to be accountable to a wider set of actors. If researchers and practitioners want to address some of the critical issues related to human rights and MSEs, it is imperative that key actors working in the rights sphere are involved in shaping the research agenda and monitoring its implementation. Academics need to take a proactive approach aimed at achieving both theoretically grounded and practically relevant solutions, with engagement occurring over an extended period of time. This approach, avowedly political and concerned with genuine action, is a key way in which MSE stakeholders can be held to account for their actions in regard to human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-190
Number of pages16
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date11 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

human rights
sport
Sports
planning
event
stakeholder
formalization
good governance
United Nations
urban development
Conceptual model
Bidding
Sports events
Human rights
Planning
Research agenda
UNO
monitoring
participation

Keywords

  • event hosting
  • mega sport events
  • Olympic Games
  • FIFA World Cup
  • human rights
  • event legacy

Cite this

McGillivray, David ; Edwards, Michael B. ; Brittain, Ian ; Bocarro, Jason ; Koenigstorfer, Joerg. / A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights. In: Leisure Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 175-190.
@article{a050e39957544975b807f5e7cdb50059,
title = "A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights",
abstract = "In this conceptual paper, the authors propose a framework for how progressive human rights outcomes may be obtained in the context of bidding, planning and implementing major sport events (MSEs) through the implementation of four pathways, including good governance, the democratic participation of stakeholders, the formalisation of human rights agendas, and the deployment of sensitive urban development. The authors argue that there is a need for adherence to internationally recognised standards, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights if rhetorical statements from MSE awarding bodies and host organisers are to be accountable to a wider set of actors. If researchers and practitioners want to address some of the critical issues related to human rights and MSEs, it is imperative that key actors working in the rights sphere are involved in shaping the research agenda and monitoring its implementation. Academics need to take a proactive approach aimed at achieving both theoretically grounded and practically relevant solutions, with engagement occurring over an extended period of time. This approach, avowedly political and concerned with genuine action, is a key way in which MSE stakeholders can be held to account for their actions in regard to human rights.",
keywords = "event hosting, mega sport events, Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, human rights, event legacy",
author = "David McGillivray and Edwards, {Michael B.} and Ian Brittain and Jason Bocarro and Joerg Koenigstorfer",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/02614367.2018.1556724",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "175--190",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights. / McGillivray, David; Edwards, Michael B.; Brittain, Ian; Bocarro, Jason; Koenigstorfer, Joerg.

In: Leisure Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2, 11.12.2018, p. 175-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights

AU - McGillivray, David

AU - Edwards, Michael B.

AU - Brittain, Ian

AU - Bocarro, Jason

AU - Koenigstorfer, Joerg

PY - 2018/12/11

Y1 - 2018/12/11

N2 - In this conceptual paper, the authors propose a framework for how progressive human rights outcomes may be obtained in the context of bidding, planning and implementing major sport events (MSEs) through the implementation of four pathways, including good governance, the democratic participation of stakeholders, the formalisation of human rights agendas, and the deployment of sensitive urban development. The authors argue that there is a need for adherence to internationally recognised standards, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights if rhetorical statements from MSE awarding bodies and host organisers are to be accountable to a wider set of actors. If researchers and practitioners want to address some of the critical issues related to human rights and MSEs, it is imperative that key actors working in the rights sphere are involved in shaping the research agenda and monitoring its implementation. Academics need to take a proactive approach aimed at achieving both theoretically grounded and practically relevant solutions, with engagement occurring over an extended period of time. This approach, avowedly political and concerned with genuine action, is a key way in which MSE stakeholders can be held to account for their actions in regard to human rights.

AB - In this conceptual paper, the authors propose a framework for how progressive human rights outcomes may be obtained in the context of bidding, planning and implementing major sport events (MSEs) through the implementation of four pathways, including good governance, the democratic participation of stakeholders, the formalisation of human rights agendas, and the deployment of sensitive urban development. The authors argue that there is a need for adherence to internationally recognised standards, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights if rhetorical statements from MSE awarding bodies and host organisers are to be accountable to a wider set of actors. If researchers and practitioners want to address some of the critical issues related to human rights and MSEs, it is imperative that key actors working in the rights sphere are involved in shaping the research agenda and monitoring its implementation. Academics need to take a proactive approach aimed at achieving both theoretically grounded and practically relevant solutions, with engagement occurring over an extended period of time. This approach, avowedly political and concerned with genuine action, is a key way in which MSE stakeholders can be held to account for their actions in regard to human rights.

KW - event hosting

KW - mega sport events

KW - Olympic Games

KW - FIFA World Cup

KW - human rights

KW - event legacy

U2 - 10.1080/02614367.2018.1556724

DO - 10.1080/02614367.2018.1556724

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 175

EP - 190

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

IS - 2

ER -