A case study of university honors students in Humanities through a disciplinary literacy lens

Jonathan Cisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Students face challenging texts in higher education, whether they are discipline-specific journal articles or great works of literature. Building on research in content area reading and disciplinary literacy, this case study explores the various stances undergraduate honors students take when coping with challenging texts while enrolled in a Midwestern university’s humanities course. Through an analysis of student interviews, writing, and observations, honors students demonstrated the use of one of three stances when reading challenging works: Bottom Liners sought the essential meaning of a text, typically through online sources; Researchers attempted to alleviate their difficulties by researching historical, social, and authorial contexts; and Feelers tried to emotionally connect with the texts’ authors. Results clarify how students cope with challenging texts from multiple disciplines in a college classroom.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
JournalLiteracy Research and Instruction
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

honor
literacy
university
student
coping
classroom
interview
education

Keywords

  • college reading
  • content area reading
  • disciplinary literacy
  • qualitative research

Cite this

@article{8b684cce97ff4c95970e6bf020e87279,
title = "A case study of university honors students in Humanities through a disciplinary literacy lens",
abstract = "Students face challenging texts in higher education, whether they are discipline-specific journal articles or great works of literature. Building on research in content area reading and disciplinary literacy, this case study explores the various stances undergraduate honors students take when coping with challenging texts while enrolled in a Midwestern university’s humanities course. Through an analysis of student interviews, writing, and observations, honors students demonstrated the use of one of three stances when reading challenging works: Bottom Liners sought the essential meaning of a text, typically through online sources; Researchers attempted to alleviate their difficulties by researching historical, social, and authorial contexts; and Feelers tried to emotionally connect with the texts’ authors. Results clarify how students cope with challenging texts from multiple disciplines in a college classroom.",
keywords = "college reading, content area reading, disciplinary literacy, qualitative research",
author = "Jonathan Cisco",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/19388071.2015.1063742",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Literacy Research and Instruction",
issn = "1938-8071",
publisher = "Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers",
number = "1",

}

A case study of university honors students in Humanities through a disciplinary literacy lens. / Cisco, Jonathan.

In: Literacy Research and Instruction, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case study of university honors students in Humanities through a disciplinary literacy lens

AU - Cisco, Jonathan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Students face challenging texts in higher education, whether they are discipline-specific journal articles or great works of literature. Building on research in content area reading and disciplinary literacy, this case study explores the various stances undergraduate honors students take when coping with challenging texts while enrolled in a Midwestern university’s humanities course. Through an analysis of student interviews, writing, and observations, honors students demonstrated the use of one of three stances when reading challenging works: Bottom Liners sought the essential meaning of a text, typically through online sources; Researchers attempted to alleviate their difficulties by researching historical, social, and authorial contexts; and Feelers tried to emotionally connect with the texts’ authors. Results clarify how students cope with challenging texts from multiple disciplines in a college classroom.

AB - Students face challenging texts in higher education, whether they are discipline-specific journal articles or great works of literature. Building on research in content area reading and disciplinary literacy, this case study explores the various stances undergraduate honors students take when coping with challenging texts while enrolled in a Midwestern university’s humanities course. Through an analysis of student interviews, writing, and observations, honors students demonstrated the use of one of three stances when reading challenging works: Bottom Liners sought the essential meaning of a text, typically through online sources; Researchers attempted to alleviate their difficulties by researching historical, social, and authorial contexts; and Feelers tried to emotionally connect with the texts’ authors. Results clarify how students cope with challenging texts from multiple disciplines in a college classroom.

KW - college reading

KW - content area reading

KW - disciplinary literacy

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1080/19388071.2015.1063742

DO - 10.1080/19388071.2015.1063742

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Literacy Research and Instruction

JF - Literacy Research and Instruction

SN - 1938-8071

IS - 1

ER -